Skip to content

Bullpen help needed?

Sep 20, 2010, 1:37 PM EST

Photo by Mark Zuckerman / NATS INSIDER
Drew Storen could be the Nats' closer, but he may need some backup.

It's been without question the strongest area of the their roster all season, but the Nationals' bullpen is far from a perfect unit, as we saw yesterday in Philadelphia.

Drew Storen's ninth-inning meltdown — four batters, four hits, four runs, game over — was both staggering and not terribly surprising at the same time. As good as Storen has been this season, the rookie right-hander has not gotten many opportunities to close. And he certainly hadn't faced anything like the scenario presented to him yesterday: trying to protect a ninth-inning lead in a hostile ballpark against the heart of the two-time defending NL champs' lineup.

Now, in the grand scheme of things, the Nationals needed to see Storen in that situation. And Storen needed to pitch in that situation. The only way to find out whether the 23-year-old has the, uh, "onions" to close in the big leagues is to throw him into the fire and see if he comes out unscathed.

Yesterday, Storen got burned to a crisp. Now, the Nats need to find out what happens the next time he finds himself in that situation. Does he let thoughts of this blown save creep into his mind and allow it to happen again? Or does he have that character trait required ofRead more »

  1. Jimmy - Sep 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM

    I totally disagree with the mind set of MLB managers and their use of closers. You should have at least two, with the idea that it one is during well (Clippard, 11 pitches in the eightth) let him pitch the 9th, also. The next night is Storen comes in the eighth and does well let him pitch the 9th. There is no written rule that a relief pitcher can't go more than 1 batter or more than 1 inning. I still say you wear pitchers by going 1 inning almost everyday. They still are using pitches by warming up before going into the game! There arm has to bounce back with rest sometime!

  2. Milo - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:04 PM

    I've been paying serious attention to ML baseball since 1968. I know some players, usually pitchers, have to finally grow up through OJT in the bigs, but the process is too often still one of the more excruciating life passages to watch. Storen will be OK, and I thnk a very good short reliever, sooner than later. In the meantime…oof.

  3. Josh - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:05 PM

    I don't think the Nats should mess with what has been one of the best bullpens in the majors this year (seriously, look it up, it is fifth-lowest in ERA). I do agree, though, that Storen shouldn't be closing, but not because I don't think he has the mentality for it–it is because he lets too many men on base by walking them, doesn't strike out enough, and gives up enough fly balls that when they start turning into home runs he will look a lot less impressive than he does this year (as we saw in the ninth inning yesterday afternoon). I agree that there should be no "designated closer" unless we have a reliever who is far and away better than anyone else on the staff, like Mariano Rivera or Joakim Soria.

  4. dj in Fl. - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM

    You can never have enough bullpen arms and a veteran with the right stuff is a real plus. I do not like it when our late inning guys pitch two, because they seem to rarely make it through two. Given the fact that most bullpen guys are short a pitch to be a starter I would rather have another arm ready for the ninth, since those on the bench have seen him throw his best in the previous Dunn says talks are picking up on his new deal

  5. Harper_ROY_2012 - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM

    I agree one hundred percent they need a "bulldog" veteran presence like Capps in the bullpen for 2011. I think Peralta, Storen, Clippard and Burnett will have some role in the 2011 opening day bullpen but I doubt any of them will be the closer. I also think we need some better long relievers for next season. It made me laugh the other night when Ray and Carpenter were amazed by the fact that the Phillies had guys who pitched one inning each and had assigned roles in the bullpen. This was a laughable observation because that is how major league teams are suppose to use their bullpen!!! However, that being said it shows how far the stasrting rotation needs to come in 2011. Finally, I fear that only Livo and Lannan are viable starters for 2011 and there will be three wildcards in the rotation to start 2011 with the usual suspects we trotted out in 2010 in the mix for those three spots.

  6. Steve M. - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:49 PM

    Luckily this Free Agent market is strong on the bullpen.The Nats will be able to take the 5th best bullpen and improve it further.

  7. MikeHarris - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM

    Well, they had better than "another Capps like" guy. They had Capps. Only 26 and already a pretty darn solid closer. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Ramos, Ramos, Ramos. Is he so good that you give up a young and proven bullpen leader?I don't think so. But he's a lot cheaper than Capps would have been next year.

  8. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 2:56 PM

    @ SteveCan you list the potential free agents who have mad bullpen skillz?

  9. Tim Cullen - Sep 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM

    Livo ain't gonna be around forever guys. I think he is on fumes now.As DJ said….you can never have enough arms. Storen needs some movement on his fastball and get a third pitch. 93-95 ain't doodily to these MLB hitters if it don't move.We also need a "lights out" lefty. One to bring in against the Howards etc. I hate to say it….but an Aroldis Chapman

  10. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM

    I see where Jason Werth has taken Scott Boras as his advisor. Could that Nats be in his future?

  11. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 3:53 PM

    Mike Harris,People like Capps and Gregg and other tier 2 relievers are always available on the market; a no. 1 catcher is a very rare commodity; the only reason the Twins made this deal is that they have Mouer and at that every single analyst has called this deal a steal for the Nats. Incidentally; as I recall Capps also went through a stretch where he blew about 4 saves in a week; he was very good but not a tier 1 closer.I agree with Jimmy 1000%; the concept of a closer is Way over blown; unless you have a Rivera or one of the other tier 1 closers (there are less than half a dozen of them) you mix and match as needed. The Nats are blessed with several really good relievers and when they are pitching well I don't see a need to take them out.

  12. SpashCity - Sep 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM

    The following guys will be free agents after the season (from MLB Trade Rumors' 2011 Free Agents Page):Octavio DotelFrank FranciscoBrian FuentesKevin GreggTrevor HoffmanChad QuallsJohn RauchMariano RiveraRafael SorianoBilly WagnerKerry WoodI think it's pretty obvious that Rivera isn't an option, and I think I read somewhere that Billy Wagner is retiring after the season. I don't think any of the other guys are considerably better than what the Nats have in the bullpen right now. Maybe Fuentes or Francisco.

  13. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM

    Spashcity,There will be others made available because their teams won't want to go to arbitration with them and thus won't tender them a contract (ala Capps).

  14. A DC Wonk - Sep 20, 2010 at 5:11 PM

    People like Capps and Gregg and other tier 2 relievers are always available on the market; a no. 1 catcher is a very rare commodityYeah — no kidding! Remember when folks here were blasting Rizzo for not having a "plan b" at catcher? Well, hello?, you have to give up something to get something. I think you're spot on, here.

  15. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 5:46 PM

    'X' out 40 year old Batista and replace with lefty Chuck James who was spectacular down in AA after moving to the bullpen for the first time in his career.

  16. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM

    They really don't need any of those free agent closers. Unless they plan on trading the closer to get something next year as they did this year.

  17. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 5:58 PM

    Anon @ 1:48, Exactly right on both issues. I can't believe the over reaction on Storen. Rivera blew 2 saves this week for the Yankees; you think they are panicking in the Bronx?

  18. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    For goodness sake , people, it was ONE game against the PHHHHHILLIEs, gosh darn it.That could have happened — and has happened — and will happen — to any closer , even a veteran. They are a tough hitting team, gunning for another championship, playing in a zoo- like atmosphere. Give the kid a break – he has done very well since Capps left – so have the rest of the relievers, who we were worshipping about a day ago. Simmer down!

  19. natsfan1a - Sep 20, 2010 at 6:27 PM

    Uh, yeah. (a) it's the Internetz; (b) they have considerably more at stake than the Nats. ;-)—Rivera blew 2 saves this week for the Yankees; you think they are panicking in the Bronx?

  20. Harper_ROY_2012 - Sep 20, 2010 at 7:08 PM

    For those of you who do not believe in closers or at least do not think you need a designated one to be a contender please look at the teams in the pennant race right now:Yankees – Rivera 29, rest of the team 7Phillies – Lidge 23, rest of the team 13Rays – Soriano 43 saves, rest of the team 6Braves – Wagner 35, rest of team 4Giants – Wilson 43, rest of the team 9Padres – Bell 42, rest of the team 2Reds – Crodero 36, rest of team 3Rangers – Feliz 36, rest of the team 6The only legitimate oddity that on the stands out is the Twins and they have 3 legit "closers" – Rauch, Capps and Fuentes. The Rockies appear to be an oddity but trades and injuries have played a factor into individual save totals.Where do the Nats rank you ask!?Nats – 34 team saves, amongst 5 individuals, most of those going to Capps 26. Yes, you read that right the Nats only have EIGHT SAVES without Capps meaning he is/was the designated close! To make things worse those 8 non-Capps saves came in 20 save opportunities, so I think that stast alone answers Mark's question..Yes we need bullpen help for 2011!!!

  21. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 7:25 PM

    John Raunch…..I remember after a game at RFK. Me and my son were waiting for the players to maybe get an autograph. Well Raunch comes out in his shiny truck. Everyone crowded around and Raunch angrily put down his window. "Anyone scratches the truck and I'm not signing!" I just took my son away. Then announcer Don Sutton came driving by. We motioned to him and he politely stopped and signed my sons ball. A Hall of Famer to boot, and 3 times the pitcher Raunchy ever was

  22. Mark L - Sep 20, 2010 at 7:25 PM

    Mark, Chuckled at your use of the term 'onions'. The first person to use that term, I think, was Bill Raftery. When they asked him why he used that term, he said " I have kids in college and need to keep my job".

  23. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 7:29 PM

    Harper_RoY,It's amazing what you can do with statistics; if a reliever gives up the lead; say in the 6th inning that's a blown save. So people like Clippard; Burnett who don't actually get to close out games have many blown saves; Capps was only used in close out situations so while he had some blown saves he also had an opportunity to accumulate many saves wheras the others could only get blown saves but had no opportunity to collect saves.There is no doubt that it's a good thing to have a shutdown closer but I think spending say 7 – 8 million on one is a great waste of resources for a team such as the Nats; if you can pick up someone like Capps for 2-3 million and then flip him; that's a good spend of money.

  24. Raff - Sep 20, 2010 at 7:59 PM

    I don't believe in closers, Harper_ROY_2012.Baseball Prospectus had an amazing article laying out this argument: brief, if closers are truly the best pitchers in the bullpen, they should be pitching in the most crucial situations — and holding a 2-3 run lead in the 9th inning is NOT the most crucial situation.The best relief pitcher should often be used earlier, BP concluded, and when the score is tied.(Perhaps it's the case that pitchers pitch better when they know they have a specific role to fill. But I haven't seen any evidence that makes me buy that argument.)

  25. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 8:24 PM

    Raff,I agree with you; I think that the difference between a good manager and a so-so manager is that the good one is willing to think outside the box while the so-so one always plays by the 'book'.I would love to see a manager bring in his best pitcher in say the 6th inning with his team up by 1 and the other team has the bases loaded with 1 out rather than let a mediocre pitcher give the game away in that spot making the 9th irrelevant.

  26. Anonymous - Sep 20, 2010 at 10:27 PM

    Isn't Capps available when FA starts?I really can't believe that Batista would be a candidate for antything next year. Olsen has done better recently than him.

  27. Souldrummer - Sep 20, 2010 at 10:45 PM

    @Anonymous 6:27You don't really want to bring Capps back. He's going to be much more expensive.





As ESPN-980 AM's Nats Insider, Mark makes daily appearances on the station's various shows. Here's the 2015 schedule (subject to change)...

MON: 12:45 p.m.
TUE: 2:30 p.m.
WED: 4:30 p.m.
THU: 2:30 p.m.
FRI: 5:30 p.m.
SAT: 10:30 a.m.

*All times Eastern. You can also listen to the station on 94.3 FM, 92.7 FM and online at Click here for past audio clips.

Follow us on Twitter