Skip to content

Rizzo, Beane, Willingham speak

Dec 16, 2010, 10:24 PM EDT

Read my full story on the trade on CSNwashington.com

The Nationals and A's each just had dueling conference calls a little while ago. I was in on the Nats' call with Mike Rizzo, who had some interesting things to say about today's trade and why it was made. My colleague John Shea of the San Francisco Chronicle, meanwhile, was on the A's call with Billy Beane and Josh Willingham and was kind enough to share what both men said.

Here you go…

MIKE RIZZO
On Henry Rodriguez (top left)
"He's a guy we've scouted a lot lately. We see a big physical, big-armed guy, with two plus-plus pitches, 23 years old, and a guy we feel can fit comfortably in our bullpen, now and for years to come. We foresee him down the road as the possibility of a guy who can pitch at the back end of the game, either set up Storen in the eighth inning or pitch in the ninth inning. It's just an attractive alternative, another 23-year-old power arm that adds to our depth at that position, and a guy we think has big upside. He's been scouted a lot lately. His numbers are trending positively, as far as the walk numbers are going. The walk numbers are going down, the strikeouts are going up. He's getting much more acclimated to theRead more »

  1. The Great Unwashed - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:34 PM

    Uh oh, Rizzo called Brown a "toolsy outfielder." Where have we heard that before? Hmmmmm…

  2. Souldrummer - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:36 PM

    Solid to see this stuff in one place. Thanks a bunch. I'm not crazy about the deal. I thought we were deep in the bullpen as things stand, and I don't think the outfield prospect is any great shakes, basically J-Max from the left hand side to me. He's 25. Rodriguez is nice, but last year he talked big on a guy who had everything but the walk numbers in Brian Bruney and we saw how that worked out. If he's going to move a reliever as part of a package for another need, I'm okay with this. Otherwise, we've limited the flexibility of our roster by signing this guy without options and strengthening an area we don't have a major need in while weakening an area we did have a need in. Willingham was one of the best OBP guys on the team and still is a possible Type A guy. He will also still have value during the year.What would make this deal look especially foolish is if the A's struggle in the first half of the year and move Willingham for more than we're getting in this deal.

  3. Doc - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:38 PM

    Good luck to The Hammer, hope he does well.

  4. Doc - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:44 PM

    Corey Brown tootsy?? We may need a re-definition of that term. .193 in 40 games at AAA??

  5. Feel Wood - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:48 PM

    Look at it this way. Rizzo has now replaced Peralta in the bullpen with a much younger power arm. He's clearly not done dealing yet. The replacement for Willingham is yet to come. You can't look at these transactions on a one-for-one basis. Building a team is a process.

  6. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:49 PM

    Great post, thanks. At least Rizzo's moves are all following the same blueprint: power relief pitching, defense and athleticism. You can argue with his priorities, but at least his moves seem coherent.

  7. JD - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:49 PM

    Common Doc, What do you want him to say? 'he is a middling prospect we got as a throw in?'. This trade is all about: 1) Willingham is not part of the future. 2) He is eligible to earn north of $6 mil in 2011. 3) Rodriguez has some serious upside potential.

  8. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:55 PM

    Mark,A week or so ago you had an article that mentioned the Nats were pursuing someone big in a trade but you could not say who. Who was it and is it still a possibility?

  9. JD - Dec 16, 2010 at 10:59 PM

    Buster Olney reports that LaRoche is seeking a 3 year deal; that's why he is not signed yet. I'd take Derek Lee for 1 year any day and consider better options next year.

  10. David - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:04 PM

    40 games is not a great sample, especially when it's the players first stint in AAA. his AA line before going to AAA, was .320/.418/.502 with 49 RBI's and 10 hr's in 339 AB's. I don't think his first 135 at bats at AAA takes away from his potential. I think it's fantastic we got a young speed guy with power that can play a plus-defense CF. Morgan is officially on notice! Why so much love for Willingham?

  11. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:06 PM

    Corey Brown may never be a major league all-star, but he is a Reggie Cleveland all-star!

  12. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM

    Look at it this way. Brown is definitely an upgrade over Burgess who was drafted in the first round in the same year? He has yet to get past AA and IS NOT a five tool outfielder as Brown is. Brown actually hit 30 home runs in the minors in 2008. Burgess the big power guy never did that. Burgess is not as fast as Brown. Burgess can't run the bases like he can. Burgess is not even close to as good a fielder. Yet Burgess was the next guy up? Now he has competition below from Harper and above from Brown. That has to be good.

  13. Luis - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:30 PM

    The Wang is back!!!

  14. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:32 PM

    Looks like Greinke is out. According to MLBTR the Nats are on his 15 team blocked without permission list. Now we know why Garza's name comes up more often.

  15. Big Cat - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM

    Love the Hammer….however, he's 31 coming off knee surgery. He has always been a liability in left and in my opinion, good pitching eats him up.This Rodriguez guy looks to good to be true, stat wise. Last year in AAA he threw 21 innings in 20 games, had 11 saves and fanned 31 with an era of 1.69. He was called to the bigs and had a 4.55 era but his innings/hits/bb's/k ratio was outstanding. Right now he is in the Venezualian winter league with an era of .070 with 21 k's in 10 innings allowing only 3 hits. Maybe the A's know something about him we don't. Corey Brown hit .350 in 98 games in Midland of the Texas League. Midland is in the Western Div and the ball flies in that dry air. He was promoted to AAA where he hit .190 in 41 games. My opinion of the trade…..BRAVO! to Rizzo.Also….this trade opens a spot for you know who. Thats right….The Chosen One….Teddy Ballgame….The White Cobra….whatever you want to call him. You heard it here first. Harper will go north with the big club out of spring training next year and start in right field with Werth in center and Morse in left. PLAY BALL!!!!

  16. Anonymous - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:49 PM

    Anon@6:21Burgess is 22, and was drafted out of high school. Brown is 25, and was drafted out of college. Burgess made AA as a 21 year old; Brown didn't get there until 23. I'm not terribly high on Burgess, but to just make a straight-up comparison based on last season is not appropriate.

  17. Stranded_in_Philly - Dec 16, 2010 at 11:50 PM

    @ Great Unwashed and SouldrummerI'm right on board with the Maxwell comparisons. That was my first thought as well. His age is definitely a concern.If this trade really was just for Rodriguez, and Brown was a throw in… I'm a little underwhelmed. Its always tough to see quality position players be traded for relief pitchers. That being said… I'm curious to see if Rizzo uses these guys as chips in another trade.

  18. Theophilus - Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM

    Somewhat more sold on Brown than when I commented on the previous post. Seems to be at least enough substance to let him play everyday when Rizzo and Riggleman finally are exhausted w/ Morgan (A) running through stop signs; (B) getting picked off; (C) whiffing on curve balls in the dirt; (D) throwing to the wrong base; (E) flipping off fans; (F) picking fights w/ guys twice his size; (G) making a run at the ML record for most outs under the infield fly rule, etc. Morgan is the real blind spot in the front office if not in the manager's office (writing his name in every day).

  19. Will - Dec 17, 2010 at 12:12 AM

    David, the fact is Brown couldn't hit AAA pitching at age 24.And, Anonymous, comparisons to Burgess aren't fair. Burgess came out of HS. At least he's three years younger and can't AA pitching (well). But at no point did he bat .193. I think the best we could hope for is Brown to turn into a 3 WAR-type OFer, which is ironic because we just traded away a guy who IS a 3 WAR OFer.

  20. Suicide Squeeze - Dec 17, 2010 at 12:30 AM

    Candidate for quote of the year:"We feel that he's got a big tool package."

  21. hscer - Dec 17, 2010 at 12:47 AM

    Considering this is basically trading an established everyday player for a relief pitcher prospect (Brown doesn't seem to have much of a real future if he can't hit AAA pitching by now), it actually doesn't upset me too much.

  22. Souldrummer - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:07 AM

    @TheophilusBrown is a Syracuse Chief until further notice. He's not ready to put pressure on Morgan and I've got to believe Plush will get a full trial next year. The best I've heard about this is that there was a whisper that Werth might play some centerfield against lefties. Got to believe that's dropped down a bit until we see what they do for first base.

  23. Anonymous - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:08 AM

    Can Wang duplicate his performance of last year?

  24. The Great Unwashed - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:19 AM

    Sorry to disappoint, Stranded in Philly. I didn't mean I'm skeptical of the trade. I was referring to Jim Bowden's fascination with "toolsy outfielders." I think he said that about Wily Mo Pena. Anyway, when Rizzo said it, it came across like he was channeling Jim Bowden. And it was déjà vu all over again.

  25. NatBiscuit - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:37 AM

    Not that Baseball America is the best ever resource … and certainly they are inconsistent year to year … But from 2008 to 2010 Brown was ranked 16, 6, and 12; Rodriguez ranked 4, 14, and 13. And, Oakland has been judged to have a pretty good farm system overall, so there is ample reason to believe these players would have had much higher ratings in the Nationals system each year.

  26. NatBiscuit - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:44 AM

    Nats have completed resigning Wang. So who gets dropped from the 40 man?

  27. Stranded_in_Philly - Dec 17, 2010 at 1:47 AM

    @ Great UnwashedAh, fair enough. The "toolsy" tag has been stuck on Maxwell so many times I just immediately assumed thats where you were going. As for the Bowden deja vu… *shudder.* Don't remind me of that dark time…

  28. patkeane13 - Dec 17, 2010 at 2:18 AM

    what is better? two draft picks (probably not even that) or an additional young arm in the bullpen along with a position player in a the minor leagues at a spot where we have no depth. Willingham is not in the future of this team and I am pleased to learn that Rizzo learned from Kasten's mistakes and got valuable pieces, as opposed to hoping that draft picks work out 5 years in the future. Save Strasburg, we all know how well our first round picks have worked out thus far. I understand the argument that Brown is pretty old for the level he is at, but he took way to few AB's to evaluate his AAA performance. He will be in the big league camp and be a starter at AAA. Rizzo pointed out (accurately as well) that Brown has struggled upon arrival to each higher rung of the minors, only to succeed later on (a pattern most players follow).Personally, I think this is a win trade, whether we package the picks for a stud frontline starter or hold onto them. You can NEVER have enough young arms or position player talent in your system. I do think Garza-Greinke/Carmona would cost us too much. Lets hold off for now on those trades (that being said, if we get either of those guys I will immediately order their jersey)Kudos to Mr. Rizzo!

  29. patkeane13 - Dec 17, 2010 at 2:21 AM

    All I want for Christmas is a left-handed first baseman

  30. Anonymous - Dec 17, 2010 at 3:12 AM

    I keep hearing that Brown couldn't hit Triple A pitching. That is just not true. He got off to a terrible start and was sent to Double A after 34 games. Was named team MVP for Double A. Got called up to Triple A and hit .341 with 3 home runs and an OPS over 1000 the last 7 games of the season. Rodriguez stats are misleading. He has an 100mph fastball and not much else. It is why he dominates at the lower level and gets hit in the bigs. If he can throw off speed for strikes he is a closer. If not he is an average middle relief guy. Two huge upside players for the Nats. Great trade and much better than fans realize now.

  31. pdowdy83 - Dec 17, 2010 at 3:23 AM

    Actually Anon 10:12, Rodriguez giving up hits is not the problem. He walks too many people but in 2010 he made a decent amount of improvement in that category. If he can cut into that just a little more he would be a decent power arm.hscer: Brown was drafted in 2007 and had a knee injury in 2009 which is why he is a bit on the late side as far as AAA. Also saying he can't hit AAA pitching yet is a bit of a misnomer. He has only had about 40 games in AAA and next season would be the season to watch for him. He has crushed A and AA pitching after making adjustments, maybe he can make the same in AAA this year.

  32. Anonymous8 - Dec 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM

    Anon @ 10:12. Good insight into looking at the positives of this trade. If those last 7 games in AAA were close to what his whole season could be then this could be a diamond in the rough!

  33. David - Dec 17, 2010 at 7:01 AM

    thanks guys for agreeing with me. it's crazy to say Brown is a dud cuz he only hit .193 in his first 135 AAA at bats, but can crush AA pitching. aren't the pitchers at AA the REAL prospects anyway? Brown gives us power hitting depth at CF. something we've never had during the Nats time in DC. if he has a hot spring he could easily platoon/beat out Morgan. he's only 25 and is close to being major league ready.

  34. N. Cognito - Dec 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM

    At 31, with recurring injury problems and one year left on his contract, the Nats responsibly had no desire to keep Willingham beyond this upcoming season anyway.Unless a player is elite, a status which does not include Willingham, those same factors reduce what you can get in return for a player.Willingham was never, by himself, going to return a top player or top of the rotation pitcher, and the Nats, again responsibly, were not going to add young ballplayers to a deal.And this deal had nothing to do with reducing payroll or freeing up money to sign someone else.

  35. Anonymous - Dec 17, 2010 at 2:33 PM

    I think it has also been reported that Rizzo generally prefers college players who have had more coaching and "big-game" experience over high school players. That makes Brown's age less problematic and explains Burgess's age (as a Bowden pick). I think Brown's success at OK State and the Texas League point to sucecess at Syracuse. If Morgan steps out of line one time, we may see Brown sooner than we imagine. ST will tell the tale.fpcsteve

Archives

FINAL NL EAST STANDINGS

W L GB
x-WASHINGTON 96 66 --
ATLANTA 79 83 17.0
NEW YORK 79 83 17.0
MIAMI 77 85 19.0
PHILADELPHIA 73 89 23.0

NL POSTSEASON SCHEDULE

NL WILD CARD GAME
WED: Giants at Pirates, 8:07 p.m. (ESPN)

NLDS
FRI: Game 1, Pirates at Nats, 12:07 p.m.,
OR Giants at Nats, 3:07 p.m. (FS1)
SAT: Game 2, PIT/SF at Nats, 5:37 p.m. (FS1)
MON: Game 3, Nats at PIT/SF, TBA (MLBN)
OCT. 7: Game 4, Nats at PIT/SF, TBA (FS1)*
OCT. 9: Game 5, PIT/SF at Nats, TBA (FS1)*
*if necessary

Mark joins Rob Carlin and Joe Orsulak every Thursday at 4 p.m. on Comcast SportsNet for a half-hour show on the Nats, Orioles and rest of MLB. Re-airs Thursdays at 11:30 p.m., Saturdays at 9 a.m. and Sundays at 11:30 a.m.

ON THE RADIO

As ESPN-980 AM's Nats Insider, Mark makes daily appearances on the station's various shows. Here's the 2014 schedule (subject to change)...

MON: 12:45 p.m.
TUE: 2:30 p.m.
WED: 4:30 p.m.
THU: 2:30 p.m.
FRI: 1:30 p.m., 5:30 p.m.
SAT: 10:30 a.m.

*All times Eastern. You can also listen to the station on 94.3 FM, 92.7 FM and online at ESPN980.com. Click here for past audio clips.

Follow us on Twitter