Skip to content

Desmond honors Robinson with No. 20

Feb 19, 2012, 8:20 PM EDT

US Presswire file photo
Ian Desmond has switched from No. 6 to No. 20 this season.

VIERA, Fla. — Ian Desmond has worn the No. 6 on the back of his jersey from the moment the Nationals first called him up to the big leagues in Sept. 2009. Why? "Because that's just the number [clubhouse manager Mike Wallace] gave me," Desmond said. "I never had any connection with it."

Desmond, though, didn't feel it was appropriate to be requesting a specific uniform number while still a rookie, or even during his second full season in the majors last year. It wasn't until this winter that the 26-year-old shortstop felt he had his foot "all the way through the door" as a big leaguer and thus was comfortable asking to make a switch.

So it is that Desmond, after 329 career games as No. 6 for the Nationals, has suddenly become No. 20 for the Nationals.

And why No. 20? Because a pair of former athletic greats who are special to Desmond wore that number: Frank Robinson and Barry Sanders.

Robinson, in particular, means a lot to the shortstop. When an 18-year-old Desmond was given a chance to play in a few springRead more ยป

  1. LurkerNowPoster - Feb 19, 2012 at 8:38 PM

    Laynce Nix wore #20 at the beginning of last year.

  2. Unkyd - Feb 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM

    I like it. Much love to you, Desi… Now, earn the honor of honoring Frank. I'm right with ya…!

  3. Gonat - Feb 19, 2012 at 9:05 PM

    I like #27, #37, and #47 as the 3 Aces of the staff. As someone mentioned, those add up to 111 as in 3 #1's, coincidence? I think not!Hopefully Desi has some magic with #20!

  4. JaneB - Feb 19, 2012 at 9:28 PM

    Unkyd, I'm right beside you, on all counts. I'll even buy the new teeshirt. Love the 111, too.

  5. gonatsgo - Feb 19, 2012 at 9:37 PM

    Watching Strasmas and getting really pumped up.I noticed the new counter up for opening day!

  6. Mark'd - Feb 19, 2012 at 10:10 PM

    Dukes, Nyjer, Cameron. That is the answer to the trivia question: Name 3 presumptive Opening Day roster outfielders who would disappear during Spring Training the last 3 years?Rizzo can't think Jason Michael or Brett Carroll are his RH replacements?A shame Lombo can't play outfielder.

  7. Anonymous - Feb 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM

    Some might say that it's a shame Desmond can't play infield.

  8. Anonymous - Feb 19, 2012 at 10:59 PM

    Time for Lombardozzi to grab an outfielders glove.

  9. C.Cohen - Feb 19, 2012 at 11:12 PM

    Sort of a non-sequitur from this post and this thread, but I wanted to go on record that it is officially time to stop grumbling and moaning about the first 4-5 years of the Lerner ownership. I have no intention or interest in defending the decisions that that Lerners made after acquiring the team and it certainly led to a lot of embarrassment. But there are 2 important reasons those of us who live and die with the Nats should no longer dwell on this.1) It's in the past. The ownership learned their lesson. They no longer try to cut corners or "out-smart" the rest of the league. They have invested in scouting and development and we now have one of the best run franchises in the league from top to bottom. more importantly…2) It was the best thing that could have happened to us! In most professional sports, the model for success (national attention, championships, etc.) is to be very bad for a period of time and have access to high draft picks that you build your franchise around.The key, and this part is very tricky, is being that bad in a year when a truly transformational talent is available to be drafted. This complete product of random chance routinely responsible for affecting the fates of a franchise for a decade or longer. Sometimes, it is not obvious what you have at the top of a draft and sometimes it REALLY is. But the difference that is made by when a team happens upon the "fortune" of picking first is very clear. Entire generations often witness their teams regularly dominate because they were terrible enough in the right year to draft Tim Duncan or Shaq instead of Michael Olowakandi or Joe Smith.This is true in every sport. See:Peyton Manning (1998) vs. Tim Couch (1999)Alex Rodriguez (1993) vs. Paul Wilson (1994)Those of us who are long suffering D.C. sports fans are reminded all too vividly how high the stakes are when just these two words are uttered: Brown, Kwame.Ultimately, what I am saying is that every mistake, misstep, and embarrassment perpetrated by the Nationals management since they arrived in D.C. conspired to grant them access to two of the most transcendental players who have entered the league in the last several decades. Had anything been done differently, we would not have been able to produce such a young and dynamically talented team as the one that will be assembled in Viera later this week. This is the baseball equivalent of getting to draft Tim Duncan and LeBron James in back to back drafts. The last thing we should do is curse the circumstances that brought us here.

  10. natsfan1a - Feb 19, 2012 at 11:50 PM

    I'm with Unk and JaneB.

  11. Anonymous - Feb 20, 2012 at 12:09 AM

    C.Cohen: It is hard to argue that the past is anything but. But the Lerners did us no favors by allowing the club to stink out loud for so long as they sold us high-Dollar tickets and delivered a low Dollar payrolls and half-shift's worth of scouts as they told us they were building it the right way over the years. Having lost our way into a couple of uber talents is very nice, but having lost so badly for so long was just not worth the small chances of landing guys like that (even though the Nats look to have pulled winning lottery tickets on Stras and Harper). The Lerners got lucky, very lucky. They are not good. I'd rather they be goopd than lucky. The Lerners spent years going cheap and bumbling and being lousy at marketing the club, it's going to take some time for me to think them anything other than lousy owners whether this team wins or not.

  12. Sunshine_Bobby_Carpenter_Is_Too_Pessimistic_For_Me - Feb 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM

    I had no idea Frank was such an early backer of Ian. I realize I'm in the minority here, but I really, really like Desmond. I think he's got plenty of tools and I think he plays hard, every inning and every at-bat. This switch to No. 20 makes me even root harder for him. He'll get the second-loudest cheer from me on Opening Day … after Ramos, of course.Great day of work, Mark. Thanks for it all.

  13. natsfan1a - Feb 20, 2012 at 1:08 AM

    So very happy that this scenario will be possible! As originally posted by Whatsanattu when Ramos was still missing.Whatsanattu said… I am looking forward to an opening day lineup that includes Wilson batting 7th or 8th. I project a couple of hits and a caught stealing. I'm thinking he will get a standing ovation at each park he plays with a particularly touching and enthusiastic ovation at the home opener. I think his whole family will be there – perhaps sitting behind home plate embarrassing the moment. November 10, 2011 11:52 PM

  14. SonnyG10 - Feb 20, 2012 at 1:22 AM

    Sunshine, I'm with you on Desi.

  15. NatsLady - Feb 20, 2012 at 1:38 AM

    Put me down as thinking Desi's going to make it. I've been a supporter of his for a long time, love to watch those leaps. Also have heard he's a genuine guy, who does the charity stuff not just for show.

  16. Sec 3, My Sofa - Feb 20, 2012 at 4:36 AM

    Of course, the beautiful thing about going on and on about nothing but the past is, you never have to face any essential risk. Failure is the essence of baseball, but if your one note is "They lost nearly 300 games in three years!" you can't be contradicted. You can be boring, you can be irrelevant, but strictly speaking, you take no risk of being wrong. It's safe.

  17. upperdeck4 - Feb 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM

    I'm a Desi guy as well. Hope he succeeds. If he's successful on the field he can be the type of clubhouse leader that we need.

  18. Anonymous - Feb 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM

    Pretty sure it's actually because Rendon was promised #6, and not because Desmond wanted to change numbers, but whatever.

Archives

NL EAST STANDINGS

W L GB
WASHINGTON 57 46 --
ATLANTA 58 48 0.5
MIAMI 52 53 6.0
NEW YORK 51 55 7.5
PHILADELPHIA 46 60 12.5
Through Monday's games

UPCOMING SCHEDULE
TUE: Nats at Marlins, 7:10 p.m.
WED: Nats at Marlins, 12:40 p.m.
THU: Phillies at Nats, 7:05 p.m.
FRI: Phillies at Nats, 7:05 p.m.
SAT: Phillies at Nats, 7:05 p.m.
SUN: Phillies at Nats, 1:35 p.m.
MON: Orioles at Nats, 7:05 p.m.
Full season schedule

Mark joins Rob Carlin and Joe Orsulak every Thursday at 4 p.m. on Comcast SportsNet for a half-hour show on the Nats, Orioles and rest of MLB. Re-airs Thursdays at 11:30 p.m., Saturdays at 9 a.m. and Sundays at 11:30 a.m.

ON THE RADIO

As ESPN-980 AM's Nats Insider, Mark makes daily appearances on the station's various shows. Here's the 2014 schedule (subject to change)...

MON: 12:45 p.m.
TUE: 2:30 p.m.
WED: 4:30 p.m.
THU: 2:30 p.m.
FRI: 1:30 p.m., 5:30 p.m.
SAT: 10:30 a.m.

*All times Eastern. You can also listen to the station on 94.3 FM, 92.7 FM and online at ESPN980.com. Click here for past audio clips.

Follow us on Twitter